🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and networks are "taking away our kids' childhood". Legislation may be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media users. Officials have indicated that an similar ban remains "an measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to approve a proposal raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors without guardian approval is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" design of these services, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a useful first step," said one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by strong data".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Charities have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after viewing harmful platform posts argues that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to build products and services that are appropriate and fit for children," said a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, action is primarily unfolding at the local level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further use requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced bills requiring guardian approval for teenagers to create social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various figures to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Beyond Europe and the US, further states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global organizations adopt a more cautious position. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might backfire". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

As this international debate unfolds, the policies of this nation and others indicate that states internationally are less and less prepared to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.